The Big Mac Index of 3D printing

Quick price study on manufacturing an iPhone case – the Big Mac index of 3D printing. I used a basic case from Thingiverse as the test subject.

First contender, Shapeways, representing additive manufacturing on-demand, produced from a polyamide plastic powder (nylon) using laser sintering:

Screen Shot 2013-08-09 at 7.44.03 PM

Next up is i.materialize also with laser sintered polyamide:

Screen Shot 2013-08-09 at 4.26.21 PM

 

i.materialize also produces in ABS plastics (like some desktop printers) through FDM:

Screen Shot 2013-08-09 at 4.23.49 PM

 

ouch…

Ponoko is more expensive on the polyamide:

Screen Shot 2013-08-09 at 7.58.18 PM

 

But cheaper on the ABS:

Screen Shot 2013-08-09 at 4.20.40 PM

I haven’t gotten back quotes for US based, small batch injection molding yet. That production does require a minimum run but series can be down to a few hundreds or even tens of units. Injection molded products will be very similar to the ABS material quoted here. And where 3D printed ones run a bit expensive, injection molding gets things to price points as low as:

Screen Shot 2013-08-09 at 4.53.12 PM

Calculating the price to home print this also remains. Apart from the issues with product fidelity and finish on home printers I also needs to work out a proper calculation model.

But regardless of the cost, I’m pretty sure the simple fact of laziness means that “very few” (relative to the entire general population that is) will be printing their own gear in the foreseeable future. Most people simply don’t give a shit that they can design and home manufacture whatever they want (as long as “whatever” is a mason jar lid or the likes that is).

 

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: